|
|  | Tim Bradley 2006 ∙ Saskatchewan, Canada ∙ Dahl Creek Outfitter... |  | Kade Gilfillan 2006 ∙ Prince William Sound, Alaska ∙ Rifle ∙ Blac... |  | Val Faust 2006 ∙ Maine ∙ Rifle ∙ Whitetail |
| |
|
|
|
| 
Since its foundation in 1994, more than 1,000 official scorers have been certified for the BTR scoring system across the United States and Canada, with the numbers growing yearly. This means there is likely an official scorer near you. Whitetail enthusiasts who have a basic understanding of how whitetail antlers are scored and who wish to become involved, please read the Become A Scorer section. Please address all correspondence to Mike Handley, Trophy Chairman, P.O. Box 244022, Montgomery, AL 36124. Call (334) 215-3337 ext. 232. | |
|
|
|
|
|
When In Rome, Hunt Like Romans
- Read more...By Buckmasters
-- You can shoot a buck with a rifle in Mississippi or Kansas and wind up on the cover of a magazine. But if you used that same centerfire to nail a buck in Illinois, your name will wind up on a court docket. You'd lose your gun, along with your hunting privileges, and you might even go to jail. You can "corn" up a sendero in South Texas and climb into the back of your truck to wait for dinnertime. But try that in Alabama, and you're going to be arrested. Even using a cell phone could result in your buck being confiscated in Ohio, though it's perfectly acceptable in Missouri.
It's fairly easy to determine what is or isn't legal in any state, if you take a look at the regulations before hunting. You might or might not agree with the rules, but you'll have to abide by them. This is why Buckmasters Whitetail Trophy Records has its own "When in Rome" yardstick. In order for someone's deer to be entered into the record book, the hunter must sign an affidavit stating that the deer was taken in accordance with the game laws of the state or province in which the animal was harvested. Actually, before this year, Buckmasters' rule went a step farther in defining what isn't considered "fair chase." Unacceptable practices included hunting with the use of aircraft, motorized vehicles and water craft, and electronic communications devices.
The lines have since become blurred, as the following true stories demonstrate. Read Full Article BTR's Best Bucks
- Read more...
|
Centerfire Rifle
|
|

Hunter/Owner: Johnny King
Classification: Perfect
Score: 198 2/8
Harvest Date: 11/18/06
Harvest Location: Grant Co., WI
|

Hunter/Owner:
Ed Koberstein
Classification: Typical
Score: 218 3/8
Harvest Date: 11/25/91
Harvest Location: Lacombe, Alberta |

Hunter/Owner: William McIntire
Classification: Semi-Irregular
Score: 223 4/8
Harvest Date:
11/18/99
Harvest Location: Upper Kingsclear, NB |

Hunter/Owner:
Tony Fulton
Classification: Irregular
Score: 321 7/8
Harvest Date:
1/5/95
Harvest Location: Winston Co., MS |
|
Pistol
|
|

Hunter/Owner: Gerald Lauby
Classification: Perfect
Score: 165 5/8
Harvest Date: 11/12/83
Harvest Location: Dawson Co., NE
|

Hunter/Owner: William Fife
Classification: Typical
Score: 175
Harvest Date: 12/2/01
Harvest Location: Hardin Co., OH |

Hunter/Owner:
Joe Happeny
Classification: Semi-Irregular
Score: 178 6/8
Harvest Date:
12/2/02
Harvest Location: Fairfield Co., OH |

Hunter/Owner: Joseph Schneider
Classification: Irregular
Score: 203 2/8
Harvest Date: 11/30/98
Harvest Location: Pickaway, OH |
|
Blackpowder
|
|

Hunter/Owner:
Dale Bevington
Classification: Perfect
Score: 172 5/8
Harvest Date: 12/13/96
Harvest Location: Miami Co., OH
|

Hunter/Owner: Douglas Rhodus
Classification: Typical
Score: 211 1/8
Harvest Date:
1/4/96
Harvest Location: S. Prebe Co., OH |

Hunter/Owner:
Ralph Postin
Classification: Semi-Irregular
Score: 201 3/8
Harvest Date:
11/30/95
Harvest Location: Fulton Co., IL |

Hunter/Owner:
Troy Wilson
Classification: Irregular
Score: 303 4/8
Harvest Date: 10/27/01
Harvest Location: Gallatin Co., KY |
|
Shotgun
|
|

Hunter/Owner:
Greg McCuiston
Classification: Perfect
Score: 181 6/8
Harvest Date: 11/15/01
Harvest Location: Hillsdale County, MI
|

Hunter/Owner:
Troy Stephens
Classification: Typical
Score: 200 7/8
Harvest Date: 11/25/96
Harvest Location: Jackson County,MI |

Hunter/Owner:
Brian Damery
Classification: Semi-Irregular
Score: 225 3/8
Harvest Date: 11/20/93
Harvest Location: Macon Co., IL |

Hunter/Owner:
Dr. Joseph Shields
Classification: Irregular
Score: 294 1/8
Harvest Date: 12/1/48
Harvest Location: Concordia Parish, LA |
|
Compound Bow
|
|

Hunter/Owner:
Geoff Lester
Classification: Perfect
Score: 180 3/8
Harvest Date: 10/27/00
Harvest Location: Ogle Co., IL
|

Hunter/Owner: Wayne Zaft
Classification: Typical
Score: 205 7/8
Harvest Date: 10/8/01
Harvest Location: Parkland, AB |

Hunter/Owner:
Jeff Severson
Classification: Semi-Irregular
Score: 217 6/8
Harvest Date:
11/12/04
Harvest Location: Kansas |

Hunter/Owner: Michael Beatty
Classification: Irregular
Score: 286 4/8
Harvest Date: 11/8/00
Harvest Location: Greene Co., OH |
|
Recurve Bow
|
|

Hunter/Owner:
Mel Johnson
Classification: Perfect
Score: 189 2/8
Harvest Date: 10/29/65
Harvest Location: Peoria, IL
|

Hunter/Owner: Wesley Holm
Classification: Typical
Score: 170 4/8
Harvest Date: 11/1/68
Harvest Location: Grundy Co., IL |

Hunter/Owner:
Wayne Tarpley
Classification: Semi-Irregular
Score: 176
Harvest Date:
11/27/98
Harvest Location: Grayson, TX |

Hunter/Owner: Clifford Pickell
Classification: Irregular
Score: 237 4/8
Harvest Date: 12/31/68
Harvest Location: Greenwood Co., KS |
|
Crossbow
|
|

Hunter/Owner:
Brad Jerman
Classification: Perfect
Score: 183 7/8
Harvest Date: 11/10/04
Harvest Location: Warren, Co., OH
|

Hunter/Owner:
Rick Williams / Dean Ziegler
Classification: Typical
Score: 185 4/8
Harvest Date: 11/95
Harvest Location: Columbiana Co., OH |

Hunter/Owner:
Daniel DeWeese
Classification: Semi-Irregular
Score: 191 2/8
Harvest Date: 10/12/97
Harvest Location: Wayne County, OH |

Hunter/Owner:
Jerry Bryant
Classification: Irregular
Score: 297 3/8
Harvest Date: 11/15/01
Harvest Location: Fulton Co., IL |
|
Pickups
|
|

Hunter/Owner: Sherman Hoschar / Dean Ziegler
Classification: Perfect
Score: 169 7/8
Date: 1989
Location: Meigs Co., OH
|

Hunter/Owner:
William Scheider Jr.
Classification: Typical
Score: 207 2/8
Location: Stephenson Co., IL |

Hunter/Owner:
Manitoba Dept. of Natural Resources
Classification: Semi-Irregular
Score: 216 3/8
Location: Manitoba |

Hunter/Owner: Lionel Crissman
Classification: Irregular
Score: 336 1/8
Date: 11/89
Location: Mahoning Co., OH |
|
Shed Antlers
|
|

Hunter/Owner: James Albring
Classification: Perfect
Score: 104 4/8
Harvest Date: 1993
Harvest Location: IL
|

Hunter/Owner:
Brad Gsell
Classification: Typical
Score: 111
Harvest Date: 1/1/59
Harvest Location: Nebraska |

Hunter/Owner:
Gerald Shaffner
Classification: Semi-Irregular
Score: 114 4/8
Harvest Location: Clark Co., IL |

Hunter/Owner: Buckhorn Museum
Classification: Irregular
Score: 145 4/8
Harvest Date: 1892
Harvest Location: McCulloch Co., TX |
Read Full Article Kansas Claims Another Golden Laurel
- Read more... By Mike Handley
Ed Koberstein’s Alberta 20-pointer might be the largest Typical ever shot by a hunter. This year’s Golden Laurel Citation winner is the largest ever ‘not shot’ by a hunter.
The squirrels and mice in Phillips County, Kan., must have cataracts. The skinny little rodents probably roam the woodlots, head-butting trees and tumbling into stump holes while searching aimlessly for sustenance. Justin Hogan, to the contrary, has 20/20 vision behind his baby blues. Even at a distance of 100 yards, the deer hunter from Densmore knew that he was looking at antlers. They were practically glowing in the tall dead grass – where the buck had made its final bed in the weeks, perhaps even months, leading up to Dec. 6, 2003. Justin, who already had filled his ’03 buck tag, was dutifully pushing out a creek bottom for some friends when he spotted the sun-bleached crown.
Photo: This world-class whitetail’s original cape wound up in the bellies of coyotes, and the antlers were bleached white. Taxidermist Tim Hager of Artistic Wildlife Creations breathed new life into the exceptional buck by using another hide and staining the rack. “It stuck out like a sore thumb,” he said, as happy as if he’d squeezed the trigger. “I hunt sheds in the springtime, so I know what a set of antlers looks like ... The spinal column was nearby, but all the other bones were long gone.” Read Full Article Measuring Main Beams
- Read more...Main beams are the two long, sweeping points growing from the normal pedicels on both sides of a buck's head, from which all typical points grow. The length of the main beam is obtained by measuring from the lowest point on the burr, over the outer curve of the beam, to the most distant point or tip of the main beam. 
Read Full Article Circumference Measurements
- Read more...Four circumference measurements (C1, C2, C3, and C4) are taken from each main beam with a 1/4-inch steel ring-end circumference measuring tape.
 FIRST CIRCUMFERENCE MEASUREMENT
The first circumference measurement (C1) is taken at the smallest point between the burr and first point or brow tine (P1). SECOND CIRCUMFERENCE MEASUREMENT
The second circumference measurement (C2) is taken around the main beam at the smallest point between the first point (P1) and the second point (P2). THIRD CIRCUMFERENCE MEASUREMENT
The third circumference measurement (C3) is taken around the main beam at the smallest point between the second point (P2) and third point (P3). FOURTH CIRCUMFERENCE MEASUREMENT The fourth circumference measurement (C4) is taken around the main beam at the smallest point between the third point (P3) and the fourth point (P4). MISSING FIRST POINT CIRCUMFERENCE RULE
If no first point (P1) exists, take the smallest circumference measurement between the burr and the second point (P2) and credit that circumference measurement to both C1 and C2 on the score sheet. ILLEGAL OR BROKEN FIRST POINT CIRCUMFERENCE RULE
If the first point (P1) exists but is too small to be a legal point, or if it has been broken off, leaving the obvious swollen area where the point once existed, circumference measurements C1 and C2 will be taken in their normal places, as if a legal P1 was present.beam. Read Full Article Interpreting Types Of Points
- Read more...Scorers will ultimately encounter points which demand interpretation. Some points grow in a typical fashion but from locations on a rack where typical points do not normally occur. In such cases the best interpretation of one side of a rack may be accomplished by comparing it to the opposite side. The rack will usually interpret itself in such cases.
"RULE OF THUMB" FOR DETERMINING TYPICAL POINTS The rule of thumb for the determination of a typical point can be summed up by applying this question to the point in question: Where do most typical points appear on most whitetail racks most of the time? Points may occur which conform to the typical point definition but are not located where most typical points appear on most whitetail racks most of the time. In such instances, even though the point in question may rise in a vertical attitude from the main beam, it may still be regarded as irregular because it does not meet the typical point rule of thumb criteria. Read Full Article Definitions Of A Point
- Read more...COMMON POINT DEFINITION
A common point is a protrusion of antler which is not less than one inch in length and whose length is greater than the width of its base.
DEFINITION OF A TYPICAL POINT

A point which rises in a vertical attitude from the main beam in a typical fashion shall be considered a typical point. There is no limit to the number of typical tines which may occur. The typical points are shaded in the above illustration and indicated by the letter "P" (P = typical point).
Read Full Article Using The Measuring Tool
- Read more...THE STEEL TAPE MEASURE All point and circumference measurements (except the length of main beam) must be taken with a 1/4-inch flexible steel tape and calculated to the nearest 1/8-inch. CORRECT PLACEMENT OF STEEL TAPE 
When measuring lengths of points with the steel tape measure, always place the hash marks on the tape against the centerline of the point being measured. This will give an exact length measurement over the centerline of the point from its tip to its baseline. If the opposite side of the tape is laid along the centerline of the point, the length will be read 1/4-inch right or left of the centerline, which may be shorter than the true length of the point.
MEASURING MAIN BEAMS WITH A STEEL CABLE All main-beam measurements must be taken with a 1/16-inch diameter steel cable. All measurements are calculated to the nearest 1/8-inch. The steel cable is a more accurate and convenient way of obtaining the main-beam measurements. MEASURING TO THE NEAREST 1/8-INCH All measurements are taken and expressed to the nearest 1/8-inch. Any measurement which lands on a 1/16-inch mark is automatically rounded off to the next highest 1/8-inch. However, if the measurement lands on a 1/32-inch mark, the measurement is rounded off to the next lowest 1/8-inch. Read Full Article Comparing Deer Within The BTR
- Read more...If one wished to compare, in detail, one deer with another in the BTR listings, he should compare deer within a specific classification with other deer having approximately the same percentage of irregular inches of antler in their scores. Naturally, in the case of antlers in the Perfect category, there are minimal irregular inches of antler, so these racks may be evaluated by the face value of their BTR score. However, antlers in the Typical, Semi-Irregular, and Irregular categories will have a certain percentage of irregular antler. A Typical deer scoring 150 points, including three percent of irregular inches, may easily be cross-referenced and compared with other deer having similar scores and percentages of irregular antler. For this reason the percentage of irregular inches is shown for each animal in its respective BTR listing. Accurate comparison is possible without having a separate category for each possible percentage of irregularity. The same method of comparison holds true for antlers in the Semi-Irregular and Irregular categories. In reality, every rack's score and percentage of irregularity becomes a category unto itself. The listings in the BTR enable exhaustive comparison of similar racks. Read Full Article 4 Classifications Of Antlers
- Read more...• PERFECT CATEGORY A Perfect rack is one in which every typical point on one main beam has a matching typical point on the opposite main beam, and whose rack contains no more than 1 percent irregular inches of antler in its total score. A Perfect rack is characterized by always having equal and even numbers of typical points. The Perfect classification is the rarest of all antler configurations among mature, trophy-class whitetails.
• TYPICAL CATEGORY A Typical rack is one whose total inches of irregular points shall not exceed 5.5 percent of its total score. Any rack whose irregular points constitute from 1.1 percent to 5.5 percent of its total score is classified as Typical. In addition, any typical rack with an uneven number of typical tines, even if there are no irregular inches of antler present, will still be classified as a Typical rack. A 9-point typical rack, for example, with five points on one side and four on the other, would automatically be classified as Typical, even if it contains no irregular inches of antler. The Typical category is the most common antler configuration among mature, trophy-class whitetails. • SEMI-IRREGULAR CATEGORYA Semi-Irregular rack is one whose total inches of irregular points range from a minimum of 5.6 percent to a maximum of 10 percent of its total score. The Semi-Irregular category is the second most common antler configuration among mature, trophy-class whitetails. • IRREGULAR CATEGORYAn Irregular rack is one whose total inches of irregular points exceed 10 percent of its total score. The Irregular category is the third most common antler configuration among mature, trophy-class whitetails. Read Full Article Score Your Buck
- Read more...Unofficially score your own buck and see if it meets the minimum score for BTR entry (140 inches for all firearms entries and 105 inches for all bow and arrow and crossbow entries). Click here for printable BTR Score Sheet.
In order to view and print PDF files, you need Adobe® Acrobat® Reader™ installed on your computer. Most computers already have this software installed, but if yours does not, you can download Acrobat Reader for free from the Adobe Web site. Click the "Get Acrobat Reader" graphic or visit http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep.html. Read Full Article BTR's Golden Laurel Citation
- Read more...Become A BTR Scorer
- Read more...BTR Official Scorer Clinic Attendance Application Criteria To be certified as an Official Scorer for the BTR, the applicant must attend a one-day Official Certification Clinic. To qualify for BTR Certification Clinic attendance, the applicant must: • Be a Buckmasters Member. • Complete BTR Scorer Clinic application and return it with $55 registration fee (payable to Buckmasters in U.S. currency) to BTR headquarters prior to scheduled clinic. • Have BTR Character Affidavit completed and signed by applicant's state/province Fish and Wildlife Department Officer, stating that applicant has no record of convictions of hunting-related crimes. For more information, contact Trophy Chairman Mike Handley at (800) 240-3337 ext. 232 or the regional director for your region at the number listed in BTR Regional Directors section.View BTR Affidavit | Register for August '08 Class Read Full Article BTR Regional Directors
- Read more...Region 1
Washington, Oregon, Idaho / Director: Pat Prentice, Nordman, ID / Ph. (208) 443-5601 Region 2
Montana, Wyoming / Director: William Sansom, St. Regis, MT / Ph. (406) 649-2670 Region 3
North Dakota, South Dakota / Director: Pending Region 4
Upper Peninsula of Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota / Director: Ron Wedge, Bristol, Indiana / Ph. (574) 848-5529 Region 5
East Colorado, Nebraska, Kansas / Director: Terry Rethman, Corning, KS / Ph. (913) 868-2320 Region 6
Missouri, Illinois, Iowa / Director: Jackie McConnell, Willard, MO / Ph. (417) 742-2395 Region 7
Ohio, Kentucky, Indiana, Lower Michigan, West Pennsylvania / Director: Ed Waite, Jr., Dayton, OH / Ph. (937) 233-0613 Region 8
Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland, Delaware / Director: J.R. Campbell, Greenwood, DE / Ph. (302) 349-4530 Region 9
East Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey / Director: Lewis Miceli III, 266 Pellum Rd., Apt. 2D, New Rochelle, NY 10801 / Ph. (914) 636-4962 Region 10
Vermont, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Maine, Connecticut / Director: Pete Porter, 175 Bliss Road, White River Jct., VT 05001 / 802-295-6644 (days) / 802-295-5378 (evenings) Region 11
Arizona, New Mexico, NW Mexico / Director: Pending Region 12
North Texas, Oklahoma / Director: Ken Witt, Arlington, TX / Ph. (817) 478-5990 Region 13
South Texas, NE Mexico / Director: Pending Region 14
Louisiana, Arkansas, Mississippi, Alabama / Director: Rusty Johnson, Rogers, AR / Ph. (479) 621-5553 Region 15
Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee / Director: Wayne Cox, 2115 Wendwood Dr., Lenoir, NC 28645 / Ph. (828) 754-9727 Region 16
Florida / Director: Pending Region 17
British Columbia, Canada / Director: Pending Region 18
Alberta, Canada / Directors: Steve Swinhoe, Ft. McMurray, Alberta / Ph. (780) 743-5309; Dave Paplawski, Calgary, Alberta / Ph. (403) 251-2806 Region 19
Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Canada / Director: Rod Lehmann, Winnipeg,
Manitoba / Ph. (204) 668-8169 Region 20
Ontario, Canada / Director: Richard Poulin, Nepean, Ontario / Ph. (613) 825-1251 Region 21
Quebec, Canada / Director: Barbara Cox, Winchester, Ontario / Ph. (613) 941-6065 Region 22
New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Cape Breton Island, Canada / Director: Pending
Read Full Article BTR Philosophy
- Read more...The philosophy of Buckmasters' new Full-Credit Scoring System is to measure and record whitetail deer antlers without forcing them to conform to a criterion of perfect symmetry. This Full-Credit Scoring System takes nothing away from the rack. It simply measures every inch of antler and classifies it accordingly. The Buckmasters system can be distinguished from other whitetail scoring systems in these nine important areas:
- The Buckmasters system does not deduct differences between lengths of opposing typical points.
- It does not include the inside-spread measurement in the score because it is a measurement of air, not antler.
- Since the inside spread between the main beams is not added into the rack's score, a rack with a broken skull plate can be entered into the BTR.
- There are four classifications of antlers categorized as: Perfect, Typical, Semi-Irregular, and Irregular.
- Minimum score is the same for each of the four categories of antlers. The minimum score for all firearms-harvested deer is 140 inches. A minimum score of 105 inches is required for all bow-harvested deer. These minimum scores may sound low until you realize the inside-spread credit is not included.
- The BTR system provides categories for all types of firearms which include centerfire rifles, shotguns, handguns, and blackpowder guns. The bow-and-arrow category includes all compounds, recurves, and longbows, with a separate category for crossbows. The "Pick-Up" category is for racks which have been found rather than harvested by a hunter. The minimum score for this category is 140 inches. There is even a category for shed antlers which are measured only as right or left antlers, not as a pair. Minimum score for shed antlers is 75 inches.
- No drying time is required before antlers can be measured.
- The BTR also has a separate category for antlers still in velvet.
- There is opportunity for entry for bucks which have been taken behind deer-proof fences, providing they meet the entrance criteria noted on the BTR Code of Ethics for Hunting On Game-Proof Fenced Properties.
The Full-Credit Scoring System does not penalize a deer's antlers because of their shape or configuration since they have no choice in how they grow. Each hunter may prefer certain antler characteristics, but to call one preference right and another preference wrong would be absurd, especially where a design of nature is concerned.
There is no justifiable reason to penalize a rack's score because of the origin of a point or the direction in which it grows. For this reason, the BTR minimum scores will be the same whether the rack is perfectly symmetrical or largely irregular. The BTR Full-Credit Scoring System's mandate is to record what nature produced, without making any assessment of its aesthetic value to the human eye.
In the case of animals such as mountain sheep or goats, there is a static horn design. These animals never depart from what is considered the norm in any way that would confuse their scoring criterion. A scoring system which is fair to one big-horn ram will be fair to all such rams because they are only created with one basic horn design. However, whitetail deer are quite another matter. For a measuring system to be as fair to deer as it is to wild sheep and goats, it must be prepared to acknowledge every antler configuration possible without penalty. This is the basis of the philosophy behind the BTR Full-Credit Scoring System.
To fully understand the Buckmasters philosophy for not including the inside-spread measurement into the rack's score, imagine a set of whitetail antlers altered to a flexible state, so that the main beams could be spread wider or narrower. In other scoring systems, the changing of the inside-spread measurement would affect the final score, either positively or negatively. However, in reality, the actual inches of antler would not be altered by widening or narrowing the inside spread. All that has really been altered is a measurement of air, not antler. For this reason, the BTR system includes the inside-spread measurement only as supplementary data for identification purposes.
When measuring typical tines, no deduction is made when one typical point does not have a matching point on the opposite antler. An example would be a 9-point rack with five typical points on one side and only four typical points on the other. BTR does not force this rack to become a hypothetical 8-pointer by deducting the unmatched point. No matter how antlers grow, the BTR will accept and record them.
By simply recording what nature produced and classifying it accurately, the BTR offers whitetail enthusiasts the opportunity to record their trophies with an unbiased, record-keeping agency that allows systematic comparison of the amazing, natural artistry of whitetail antlers. Read Full Article Previous Page | Next Page | |
|
|
|